Omar Chowdhury

Echo, Saturn (III) (2020)

Installation view of Echo, Saturn (III) in Berlin
Installation view of Echo, Saturn (III) (Artist Interview) and Calendar (2020), How to Shape a Society of Care? On Kinship and Multiple Homes, Der Bogen, Berlin
film from Echo, Saturn (III)
Echo, Saturn (Artist Interview) (2020), single-channel video, colour, stereo. Performed by Omar Chowdhury and Z. Elders.
Closed reconstructed Janata Bank calendar from 1980 beneath a yellow lightReconstructed Janata Bank calendar from 1980 opened to May and June
Calendar (2020), thirteen-page wall calendar, digital print, spiral-bound and annotated in ballpoint pen; approximately 50 × 71 cm per page · Calendar (2020), detail, opened to May–June

The Echo, Saturn (III) (2020) installation brings together Echo, Saturn (Artist Interview), a staged exchange performed with curator Z. Elders, with two copies of a reconstructed 1980 Janata Bank calendar ostensibly drawn from Dr Shahidul Zaman’s archive. A familiar promotional format turns against its subject: the interviewer presses the artist on the unequal economies of working in Bangladesh, his diasporic authority, cultural appropriation, his use of collaborators’ memories and the slippage between parafiction and deception. The questions are often rude, confronting and incriminating.

The calendars make this uncertainty physical. Across thirteen pages, the same May–June spread recurs almost unchanged; a river scene and the phrase “The beauty of a river cruise” appear, disappear and shift position, turning a mundane corporate object into a faulty instrument of recall. One copy is shown closed beneath yellow light and another opened elsewhere in the building, while the interview and its printed transcript separate speech from evidence. The curator Z. Elders put strict contractual limits on the work: permission must be asked for every two years, the work cannot be videotaped, and the captions must say “Performed by Omar Chowdhury and Z. Elders.”

Together, the works ask whether another person’s archive can ever be borrowed without being transformed—and whether acknowledging the violence of authorship undoes it, or simply absorbs criticism back into the work.

View in complete works sequence